"YES" Promotional Badge
DimensionsOverall: 5.5 x 5.5 cm
Credit LineGift of Elizabeth Spicer, 1993
Object number1993.031.006
Label TextA supporter of the proposed Charlottetown Accord wore this button. The Charlottetown Accord was a comprehensive package of proposed constitutional amendments, which was ultimately rejected by Canadian voters in a 1992 referendum. While the accord had the support of the federal government and all ten provinces, it faced strong opposition and failed to achieve the necessary majority in the national vote. The Charlottetown Accord proposed constitutional recognition of Aboriginal self-government, which aimed to recognize the inherent right of Aboriginal peoples to self-government and to establish Indigenous governments as a "third order of government" in Canada. The Accord also proposed an elected Senate with equal representation for each province and additional seats for Indigenous peoples. It endeavoured to clarify the division of powers between the federal and provincial governments, including exclusive provincial jurisdiction over areas like forestry and mining. Further, the accord included a social charter promoting rights to healthcare, education, and a clean environment. It also recognized Quebec as a distinct society within Canada. Those who supported the Accord argued that it was essential for national unity and would prevent further separatist movements, particularly in Quebec. They supported the Accord's attempt to to address historical grievances and provide greater autonomy and self-determination for Indigenous peoples. They also approved of the way it would improve the relationship between the federal and provincial governments by clarifying jurisdictional issues and promoting cooperation. As well, supporters liked that it was intended to provide a more stable and inclusive constitutional framework for Canada. Despite supporters' efforts, the Charlottetown Accord was defeated for a number of reasons. The accord faced widespread public criticism for being a "backroom deal" and for perceived elitism in its negotiation. Many also found it to be too complex and difficult to understand, leading to confusion and uncertainty. More specifically, some expressed concerns about the Senate reform, the division of powers, and the potential impact on federal social programs. As for the aspects intended to address Indigenous concerns, some Indigenous groups felt it didn't go far enough, while others on the "no" side criticized it as being too generous.
NameButton, Promotional
